EXPOSED: Dating Methods Debunked

Why "Millions of Years" is a House Built on Sand

Truth Carriers EXPOSED Series

Table of Contents

1Introduction: The Age Question

RECEIVE - Why Does Age Matter?

"In six days Yahuah made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is" - Exodus 20:11

WHAT THEY CLAIM

"The earth is 4.5 billion years old. This has been proven by radiometric dating methods. All scientists agree. The evidence is overwhelming."

THE TRUTH

Dating methods rest on unprovable assumptions. When tested on rocks of known age, they often give wildly wrong results. Evidence for a young earth is suppressed or ignored. The "billions of years" narrative is required for evolution - without it, evolution is impossible.

Why Old Earth is Essential for Evolution

REFLECT - Questions

1. Why do evolutionists need millions of years?

2Assumptions in Dating Methods

RECEIVE - The Foundation of Sand

THREE UNPROVABLE ASSUMPTIONS

All radiometric dating methods require these assumptions:

  1. Known Initial Conditions: We must know how much parent and daughter isotope were present at the start. But we weren't there!
  2. Closed System: No parent or daughter isotopes were added or removed. But rocks are not sealed containers!
  3. Constant Decay Rate: The decay rate has never changed. But we've only been measuring for ~100 years!

WHY THESE ASSUMPTIONS FAIL

AssumptionProblem
Initial conditionsLava already contains "daughter" products
Closed systemWater, heat, pressure can add/remove isotopes
Constant decayEvidence suggests accelerated decay in past

The Hourglass Analogy

Dating a rock is like finding an hourglass:

Without knowing these, you can't determine how long it's been running!

REFLECT - Questions

1. What three assumptions do all radiometric methods require?

3Radiometric Dating Basics

RECEIVE - How It's Supposed to Work

Radioactive Decay

Example: Uranium-238 → Lead-206 (half-life: 4.5 billion years)

Common Dating Methods

MethodParent → DaughterHalf-LifeUsed For
Carbon-14C-14 → N-145,730 yearsOrganic material
Potassium-ArgonK-40 → Ar-401.3 billion yearsVolcanic rock
Uranium-LeadU-238 → Pb-2064.5 billion yearsIgneous rock
Rubidium-StrontiumRb-87 → Sr-8748.8 billion yearsOld rocks

THE FORMULA PROBLEM

Age = ln(1 + D/P) × t½ / ln(2)

This formula assumes:

REFLECT - Questions

1. What is a "half-life"?

4Problems with Radiometric Dating

RECEIVE - When Dating Methods Fail

ROCKS OF KNOWN AGE - WRONG DATES!

Rock / EventKnown AgeRadiometric "Age"
Mt. St. Helens lava (1980)~10 years350,000 - 2.8 million years
Mt. Ngauruhoe, NZ (1954)~50 yearsUp to 3.5 million years
Sunset Crater lava (1064 AD)~900 years270,000 years
Hualalai basalt (1800-1801)~200 years1.6 million - 2.96 billion years

If the methods fail on rocks of known age, why trust them for unknown ages?

DISCORDANT DATES

When multiple methods are used on the same rock, they often give wildly different ages:

Why Do They Keep Using These Methods?

REFLECT - Questions

1. What happened when Mt. St. Helens rocks (10 years old) were dated?

5Carbon-14 Dating Problems

RECEIVE - The Most Common Dating Method

How C-14 Dating Works

Living organisms absorb C-14 from atmosphere. When they die, C-14 decays. Compare C-14/C-12 ratio to estimate age.

Maximum range: ~50,000 years (after that, too little C-14 remains)

C-14 FOUND WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE!

If materials are millions of years old, they should have NO detectable C-14. But C-14 is found in:

This indicates these materials are young - thousands, not millions of years!

C-14 CALIBRATION PROBLEMS

REFLECT - Questions

1. Why is finding C-14 in coal and diamonds significant?

6Potassium-Argon Dating Failures

RECEIVE - The Go-To Method for Old Ages

How K-Ar Dating Works

Potassium-40 (K-40) decays to Argon-40 (Ar-40). Measure ratio to estimate age.

Assumption: All Ar-40 comes from K-40 decay after rock formed.

THE EXCESS ARGON PROBLEM

Rocks can trap argon from the environment ("excess argon"), giving falsely old ages:

DOCUMENTED K-AR FAILURES

SampleTrue AgeK-Ar "Age"
Mt. St. Helens dacite (1986)10 years350,000 - 2.8 million years
Kilauea basalt (1959)0 years8.5 million years
Mt. Etna basalt (1972)0 years210,000 - 490,000 years

REFLECT - Questions

1. What is "excess argon" and why is it a problem?

7The RATE Project Findings

RECEIVE - Scientific Research on Radiometric Dating

What Was RATE?

Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth

An 8-year research project (1997-2005) by credentialed scientists investigating radioactive dating.

KEY RATE FINDINGS

  1. Helium in Zircons: Zircon crystals contain too much helium. If billions of years old, helium would have escaped. Data indicates thousands, not billions of years.
  2. C-14 in Diamonds: C-14 found in diamonds that should have none if billions of years old.
  3. Discordant Ages: Different methods give different ages for same rocks.
  4. Polonium Halos: Radiohalos indicate rapid formation, not slow processes.

RATE Conclusion

Evidence suggests accelerated decay occurred in the past. If decay rates were faster during Creation week and/or the Flood, this would explain:

REFLECT - Questions

1. What did the RATE project find regarding helium in zircons?

8Circular Reasoning in Dating

RECEIVE - The Dating Game

THE CIRCULAR LOGIC

How do they date fossils?

"By the rocks they're found in."

How do they date the rocks?

"By the fossils in them."

This is circular reasoning!

Index Fossils

Certain fossils are used to "date" rock layers:

Problem: These ages were assigned based on evolutionary assumptions BEFORE radiometric dating existed!

THE GEOLOGIC COLUMN

REFLECT - Questions

1. Explain the circular reasoning in fossil dating:

9Evidence for a Young Earth

RECEIVE - What the Evidence Actually Shows

EVIDENCE FOR A YOUNG EARTH

EvidenceMaximum AgeExpected if Old
Salt in oceans~62 million yearsMuch higher concentration
Sediment in oceans~12 million yearsOceans filled with sediment
Erosion of continents~10 million yearsContinents eroded flat
Earth's magnetic field~20,000 yearsNo magnetic field left
Moon recession~1.5 billion yearsMoon touching Earth in past
Helium in atmosphere~2 million yearsMuch more helium
C-14 in coal/diamonds~50,000 yearsNo C-14 remaining

Why This Evidence is Ignored

REFLECT - Questions

1. List three evidences for a young earth:

10Soft Tissue in Dinosaur Bones

RECEIVE - The Discovery That Shocked Evolutionists

THE MARY SCHWEITZER DISCOVERY

In 2005, Dr. Mary Schweitzer discovered soft tissue inside a T. rex femur:

This should be impossible if the bones are 65+ million years old!

THE PRESERVATION PROBLEM

Proteins and soft tissue cannot last millions of years:

Yet soft tissue has been found in over 100 dinosaur specimens!

The Evolutionary Response

REFLECT - Questions

1. Why is soft tissue in dinosaur bones evidence for a young earth?

11Historical Records vs. Dating

RECEIVE - When History Contradicts Dating

Written History vs. Radiometric Dating

Written human history goes back ~5,000 years. Before that, no records exist.

Question: If humans have been around for 200,000+ years (as claimed), where are the records, cities, and artifacts?

POPULATION EVIDENCE

Current world population: ~8 billion

Starting with 8 people (Noah's family) and a very conservative growth rate of 0.5% per year:

Human population data fits biblical timeline, not evolutionary one!

Ancient Civilizations

REFLECT - Questions

1. How does human population growth support a young earth?

12Biblical Chronology

RECEIVE - What Scripture Actually Says

"For in six days Yahuah made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day." - Exodus 20:11

Biblical Timeline

EventYears Before Present
Creation~6,000 years
The Flood~4,500 years
Tower of Babel~4,200 years
Abraham~4,000 years
Exodus~3,500 years

Calculated from genealogies in Genesis 5 & 11, plus historical anchors.

THE BOTTOM LINE

RESPOND - Final Reflection

1. What will you say when someone claims "science has proven the earth is billions of years old"?