Evolution Destroyed

The Law of Biogenesis states that life comes only from pre-existing life. This has been confirmed billions of times without exception.

Louis Pasteur conducted the swan-neck flask experiments in 1859-1862, definitively disproving spontaneous generation.

The Law of Biogenesis has NEVER been violated in any laboratory observation. No one has ever observed life arising from non-life.

Evolution requires abiogenesis (life from non-life) to have occurred at least once. But the Law of Biogenesis, established as scientific law, states this is impossible. Evolution's foundational requirement directly contradicts established scientific law.

This is significant because it shows spontaneous generation was officially rejected by the scientific establishment over 160 years ago. Modern evolutionists who believe life arose from non-life are actually returning to a pre-scientific view that was experimentally disproven.

Hydrolysis is the chemical process where water breaks molecular bonds, destroying the very molecules needed for life.

Steven Benner stated that organic molecules given energy "don't form life. They form tar."

Water DESTROYS complex molecules through hydrolysis. The National Academy of Sciences calls water "a corrosive agent that destroys complex organic molecules."

The paradox is that water is essential for life - all living things require it. Yet water destroys the building blocks of life through hydrolysis. Life needs water to exist, but life's components cannot form in water.

Benner is a leading secular origin-of-life researcher, not a creationist. His admission cannot be dismissed as religious bias. When the experts themselves say their theory is "impossible," it carries significant weight.

Mycoplasma genitalium, the simplest known free-living organism, has 580,000 base pairs of DNA.

Even with intelligent design, scientists could not create a functioning cell with fewer than 473 genes.

28% of essential genes have functions that scientists cannot explain - they just know they're necessary.

Evolution requires a gradual pathway from simple to complex. But there is no cell simpler than ~473 genes that can survive. All 473 genes must be present simultaneously, meaning there's no simpler stepping stone for natural selection to act upon.

Scientists do NOT fully understand why all genes are essential - 28% have unknown functions.

The universal probability bound represents the maximum possible events in cosmic history.

Douglas Axe's research found that only 1 in 10^77 random sequences would produce a functional protein.

A minimal cell requires 250-500 proteins working together simultaneously.

The universal probability bound tells us the maximum number of opportunities the universe has ever provided. Events less probable than 1 in 10^150 cannot be attributed to chance - there simply haven't been enough opportunities in cosmic history.

These calculations come from peer-reviewed secular scientific journals (Journal of Molecular Biology), not creationist sources.

The experiment produced only glycine and alanine - the two simplest amino acids of the 20 needed.

All amino acids produced were racemic mixtures, which are completely unusable by life.

NASA Astrobiology states the early atmosphere "looked nothing like the Miller-Urey simulation."

1) Intelligent scientists designed the apparatus. 2) Gases were carefully selected (even if wrong). 3) Energy was precisely controlled. 4) Products were isolated before destruction. This shows intelligence was required even to produce unusable results.

Life uses exclusively left-handed amino acids. Racemic mixtures contain equal amounts of left and right-handed molecules. Even one wrong-handed amino acid can destroy protein function, so 50/50 mixtures are completely unusable.

All amino acids in proteins are exclusively left-handed (L-amino acids).

All sugars in DNA/RNA are exclusively right-handed (D-sugars).

Natural chemistry always produces racemic mixtures of equal left and right-handed molecules.

The journal called it "one of the most compelling and unresolved mysteries."

Natural chemistry only produces 50/50 mixtures, but life requires 100% purity. No natural process is known that can sort molecules by handedness. This means the homochirality of life cannot be explained by natural processes - it points to design.

DNA requires protein enzymes (specifically DNA polymerase) to replicate.

Proteins cannot be produced without the coded instructions contained in DNA.

Scientists proposed RNA came first since it can store information and perform limited catalysis.

Bernhardt called it "the worst theory... except for all the others" - meaning all options are problematic.

DNA and proteins are mutually dependent - neither can exist without the other. There's no gradual pathway because a partial system doesn't function. Both must appear simultaneously, which points to intelligent creation rather than gradual evolution.

The human genome contains approximately 3 billion base pairs.

All known codes come from intelligent sources - no exception has ever been observed.

The synthetic life project cost approximately $40 million over 15 years.

They took an existing cell, removed its DNA, and inserted designed DNA. The cell's existing machinery did the work. They didn't create life from scratch - they modified existing life using intelligent design.

DNA is a coded information system with grammar, syntax, and meaning. All known codes come from intelligent sources - this is an empirical observation, not a religious claim. Since we have no examples of codes arising naturally, the code in DNA logically points to an intelligent source.

Each human acquires approximately 100 new mutations per generation.

Most mutations are near-neutral but slightly harmful - not beneficial as evolution requires.

The evidence shows the human genome is degrading due to accumulating harmful mutations.

Evolution requires beneficial mutations to accumulate, building new information and complexity. But the evidence shows harmful mutations accumulating while selection cannot remove them fast enough. The direction is DOWN (degradation) not UP (improvement) - the opposite of evolutionary predictions.

The biblical account describes creation as originally "very good" but now subject to the curse. Genetic entropy - starting perfect and degrading - is exactly what we'd expect. Evolution predicts the opposite (starting simple, becoming complex), which contradicts the evidence.

The Cambrian Explosion occurred in only 1.7% of the supposed fossil record duration.

Crick said the origin of life "appears at the moment to be almost a miracle."

Urey admitted "We all believe as an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter."

Koonin called the origin of life field "a failure" with no "plausible coherent model."

When secular scientists - who have no religious motivation to doubt evolution - admit the theory has fundamental problems, their admissions carry special weight. They cannot be dismissed as biased creationists. Their honesty reveals that the problems with evolution are scientific, not religious.

The horizon problem shows that opposite sides of the universe have the same temperature, but are too far apart for heat exchange since the supposed Big Bang.

Matter and antimatter annihilate when they meet. If the Big Bang created equal amounts, the universe should have self-destructed.

Radiometric dating requires ALL three assumptions: known initial conditions, constant decay rates, and a closed system. None can be verified for ancient rocks.

When tested on rocks of KNOWN age (Mt. St. Helens 1980, Hawaiian lava 1801), radiometric dating gives wildly wrong ages - millions or billions of years for rocks less than 200 years old.

The Mt. St. Helens failure is devastating because we KNOW the rock is only decades old, yet radiometric dating says millions of years. If the method fails on rocks of known age, why trust it for rocks of "unknown" age? The entire evolutionary timescale is built on an unreliable foundation.

The original 1975 comparison only examined protein-coding genes, which represent ~1.5% of the genome. The other 98.5% was not compared.

Dr. Jeffrey Tomkins' full-genome analysis found ~84% similarity, not the commonly claimed 98-99%.

The ENCODE project found at least 80% of the genome is biochemically active, destroying the "junk DNA" myth.

Orphan genes are genes with no evolutionary ancestors - they appear unique to each species with no homologs in other organisms. 10-30% of any genome consists of orphan genes. They cannot be explained by gene duplication or common descent - they appear fully functional with no transitional forms, pointing to unique creation.

The "junk DNA" prediction was WRONG. Evolution predicted most DNA would be useless garbage from millions of years of mutations. The ENCODE project proved at least 80% is functional. Creation predicted purpose throughout - and was confirmed.

1. Always cite specific scientists and their admissions
2. Use numbers and data (probability bounds, percentages, dates)
3. Note when the admission comes from secular scientists (not creationists)
4. Distinguish between observation and assumption
5. Point out when evolution's predictions were WRONG (junk DNA, simple cells, etc.)
6. Connect the evidence to what Scripture teaches