Dating Methods Debunked
Truth Carriers Academy | All AgesEvolution requires millions of years. Dating methods that claim these ages rest on assumptions that cannot be verified.
Radiometric dating rests on unprovable assumptions
Can any of these assumptions be verified for ancient rocks?
Mt. St. Helens: rapidly formed strata later mis-dated
What does misdating known-age rocks imply for unknown ages?
C-14 should be gone after ~50,000 years, yet it is found in:
C-14 detected in dinosaur bones challenges deep-time claims
Why shouldn’t C-14 be in dinosaur bones if they’re 65M years old?
Soft tissue recovered from dinosaur bones
Why is soft tissue a problem for “millions of years”?
Index fossils assume evolutionary ages; rocks inherit those ages; conflicting radiometric dates are often discarded.
Explain the circular reasoning in fossil/rock dating:
| Evidence | What It Shows |
|---|---|
| Magnetic field decay | Too rapid for billions of years |
| Helium in zircons | Suggests thousands of years |
| Comet decay | Short lifespans |
| Soft tissue & C-14 | Not compatible with millions of years |
Name three evidences for a young earth: